| 1 |
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 18.52.29 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/05/2010 02:32 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this |
| 4 |
> > snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm |
| 7 |
> > # uclibc need tls and nptl support for SSP support" |
| 8 |
> > SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE="" |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Please note how the #-starting comment is inside the SSP_STABLE variable |
| 11 |
> > declaration. It looks very obvious when seen in a syntax-coloring editor. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I'm not sure if it breaks, as "uclibc", "need", "tls" etc. are not valid |
| 14 |
> > arch names, but it's still probably not intended. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Open a bug? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Regards, |
| 19 |
> Petteri |
| 20 |
allready fixed in cvs and it was not intended. |
| 21 |
/Magnus |
Archives