| 1 |
William Hubbs posted on Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:02:35 -0600 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC. |
| 4 |
> We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs |
| 5 |
> it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in |
| 6 |
> moving it to stable faster than 30 days (I'm thinking more like 14). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> In other words, I need testers. So, if you aren't running |
| 9 |
> OpenRC-0.11.4,, and you are willing to test for regressions, please |
| 10 |
> upgrade and file bugs asap, especially if you find regressions. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
$ equery l openrc |
| 13 |
* Searching for openrc ... |
| 14 |
[IP-] [ ] sys-apps/openrc-9999:0 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
$ rc --version |
| 17 |
rc (OpenRC) 0.11git-1a8cd5 (Gentoo Linux) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
With the pull (scripted ebuild fetch) I just did, I pulled in the 0.11.3 |
| 20 |
and 0.11.4 tags and three commits, including one that officially bumps to |
| 21 |
0.12, and there's a bunch of commits between either ORIG_HEAD or new HEAD |
| 22 |
and 0.11.4, so I guess even ORIG_HEAD is really 0.12 series even if it |
| 23 |
did still say 0.11, which would make 0.11.4 a downgrade for me, but |
| 24 |
FWIW... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'm updating every few days and haven't had any problems with it in |
| 27 |
awhile. =:^) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 31 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 32 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives