| 1 |
On 12th November I plan to request the x86 and amd64 arch teams to mark |
| 2 |
2.6.23 stable. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Right now we have one reported kernel regression: |
| 5 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197264 |
| 6 |
but I expect this to be fixed in advance. If more come up, they will |
| 7 |
potentially delay the above stabling, but hopefully we'll fix them all |
| 8 |
quick enough that we can stick to the above date. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Regressions related to packages unrelated to the kernel itself are |
| 11 |
tracked here: |
| 12 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195298 |
| 13 |
I'll be going through these soon and helping out where I can, but |
| 14 |
ultimately it's up to the maintainers to actually fix these in the |
| 15 |
stable tree, and open bugs there are unlikely to hold up any kernel |
| 16 |
stabling. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Daniel |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives