| 1 |
On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:41 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> It is? Actually, I'd say that the query is utterly crippled, since |
| 3 |
> there's no way to search for all bugs on a particular package. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Query isn't crippled. If anything: Bugzilla, as shipped, gives us a |
| 6 |
suboptimal set of fields for our particular use case. If the package name |
| 7 |
is in the Summary line like it should be, then it can be searched... but |
| 8 |
since this relies on user input instead of a selection list, it's not |
| 9 |
reliable. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It would be nice if there were a way to class & subclass maybe 5-6 levels |
| 12 |
deep, without having to assign terms like "product" and "component" -- |
| 13 |
those levels could be named whatever is appropriate. Alas. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 17 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives