1 |
On Thursday 29 July 2004 10:41 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> It is? Actually, I'd say that the query is utterly crippled, since |
3 |
> there's no way to search for all bugs on a particular package. |
4 |
|
5 |
Query isn't crippled. If anything: Bugzilla, as shipped, gives us a |
6 |
suboptimal set of fields for our particular use case. If the package name |
7 |
is in the Summary line like it should be, then it can be searched... but |
8 |
since this relies on user input instead of a selection list, it's not |
9 |
reliable. |
10 |
|
11 |
It would be nice if there were a way to class & subclass maybe 5-6 levels |
12 |
deep, without having to assign terms like "product" and "component" -- |
13 |
those levels could be named whatever is appropriate. Alas. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
17 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |