1 |
On 12/12/2013 04:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> All, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> We got a request from Debian to rename the "rc" binary of OpenRC due to |
5 |
> a naming conflict they have. They have a port of the at&t plan 9 shell, |
6 |
> which has a binary named "rc" as well[1]. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be |
9 |
> unique. |
10 |
|
11 |
Make it build-time configurable. Keep default at "rc". Let Debian and |
12 |
others rename it as they want/need. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I know at least one thing that will break is everyone's inittab, so |
15 |
> should I sed their inittab in our live ebuild or expect them to fix it |
16 |
> and give a warning? |
17 |
|
18 |
It's change to change things, it doesn't fix any bugs we have. |
19 |
|
20 |
So don't break things for fun, please ... |
21 |
|
22 |
> I know that once OpenRC with this change is |
23 |
> released, it will need to probably be p.masked until there is a new |
24 |
> release of sysvinit that updates the inittab. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I'm not sure what else will break. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Does anyone have any ideas wrt other things to look for, or should I |
29 |
> make the changes upstream and have people let us know what |
30 |
> else breaks? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> William |
33 |
> |
34 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 |
35 |
> |