1 |
Alec Warner posted on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:16:36 -0700 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> I don't find it unreasonable to implement a tool as Duncan suggested |
4 |
> because it is not a judgement but a statement of fact. "The license for |
5 |
> app/foo has changed from X to Y. You should review the changes |
6 |
> accordingly by running <blah>" |
7 |
|
8 |
Just noting that it wasn't me that made that suggestion, it was Dale. |
9 |
Credit where credit is due and all that. FWIW, I agree it'd be nice, but |
10 |
also think it sounds like it it could be more work than it's worth -- |
11 |
unless someone with the skills and the itch wants to scratch it, of course. |
12 |
|
13 |
(I hadn't replied to this thread previous to this. Not that I hadn't |
14 |
thought about it, but for a moment there, I was wondering if I had replied |
15 |
when half asleep (I don't drink so couldn't use /that/ excuse), thus no |
16 |
memory of it, and was wondering in alarm what else I might have said! So |
17 |
it was with some relief that I realized it was Dale's suggestion you were |
18 |
talking about, not mine. =:^) |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
22 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
23 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |