From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass | ||
Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:14:19 | ||
Message-Id: | ebac5e04-9975-2760-bb02-6c50b3373d77@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass by Mike Gilbert |
1 | On 9/12/19 5:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Putting the dependencies in RDEPEND means users get stuck with yet |
4 | > another copy of the code installed, in addition to the copy that is |
5 | > statically linked into all reverse dependencies. |
6 | > |
7 | > It's not a very good solution to the problem. |
8 | > |
9 | |
10 | No argument there. The elegant solution to static linking is to not do |
11 | it. But I guess that's off the table? So now we're trying to find the |
12 | best not very good solution. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |