| 1 |
Actually it seems most time is spent after each "...done" statement. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-John |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
söndagen den 31 augusti 2003 kl 16.16 skrev leio@×××××××××××××××××.org: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, John Nilsson wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> No, no. The download is quick. But the calculation of deptree and that |
| 10 |
>> kind of things that takes so much time. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Also what is this metadata directory? (Sorry for not RTFM). |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> -John |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> After every rsync it rebuilds the cache... at least by default. |
| 18 |
> That's what takes the most time with an emerge sync on my 166MHz |
| 19 |
> computer. |
| 20 |
> It was discussed a while ago that the cache has changed maybe by 5%, |
| 21 |
> but |
| 22 |
> it does it all again. Parses some things, writes lots of files to |
| 23 |
> cache, |
| 24 |
> etc. There were ideas how to make it quick again, but unfortunately |
| 25 |
> either |
| 26 |
> no-one has brought it to reality or into the official portage. |
| 27 |
> If that's not your speed problem, disregard this e-mail, but I believe |
| 28 |
> this the most time demanding operation with emerge sync as of now. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Mart Raudsepp |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives