From: | Andrey Grozin <grozin@×××××××××××××××××.org> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ? |
Date: | Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:58:08 |
Message-Id: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0812240553530.4080@woodpecker.gentoo.org |
1 | On Wed, 24 Dec 2008, Petteri R?ty wrote: |
2 | > Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action |
3 | > somewhere by someone? |
4 | As recently discussed on the list, econf dies by itself, and || die should |
5 | better be removed after econf. The same is true for, e.g., eqmake4. It was |
6 | discussed (don't have a reference to the thread at hand) that it would be |
7 | useful to have a table which shows which functions die by themselves, and |
8 | which not. |
9 | |
10 | Andrey |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ? | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] List of ebuild functions that die/do not die | Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> |