1 |
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> writes: |
2 |
>> > cp -f "${tmpf}" "$f" || die "copy back failed" |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Why '-f' is required? |
5 |
> Corner cases w/ copying and bad ebuild usage (specifically running |
6 |
> ebuild as two different non-root users during development). Mostly |
7 |
> habit. |
8 |
|
9 |
Reading: |
10 |
|
11 |
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/cp.html |
12 |
|
13 |
in 3.a.ii it is stated 'cp' should behave like redirection if file |
14 |
already exists, but in case it must actually force (3.a.iii) it does |
15 |
unlink first and in that case permissions of destination are not |
16 |
preserved. So it should either be 'cp' alone or redirection as I already |
17 |
have. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Another thought I had, is that if you're using eawk on something in |
20 |
> $ROOT, you're also going to clobber ownership, permissions and |
21 |
> extended attributes. |
22 |
|
23 |
Yes, that's why I have used stream redirection in the first place to |
24 |
make it explicit/clear that permissions and attributes are preserved. |
25 |
|
26 |
> If we declare the calling format in BSD style: |
27 |
> <args> <files> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Then this is negated, but means you need to be able to find the first |
30 |
> file in the list, which requires parsing the options correctly. |
31 |
|
32 |
Which is not even an option here. (Pun intended.) |
33 |
|
34 |
> Another variation that you haven't considered above is passing |
35 |
> multiple programs to awk via -e or -f options, in which case there is |
36 |
> no non-option program argument. |
37 |
|
38 |
Indeed. So one of these: |
39 |
|
40 |
a) eawk <file> <awk_args...> |
41 |
b) eawk <files...> -- <awk_args...> |
42 |
c) eawk <awk_args...> -- <files...> |
43 |
|
44 |
in (b) and (c) "--" is required. This makes it easy to separate options |
45 |
From files without parsing args. With (c) we would have interface almost |
46 |
similar to awk (only that we require "--"). (a) is simplest in |
47 |
implementation and doesn't require "--". I am not sure which is most |
48 |
intuitive. What do you think? |
49 |
|
50 |
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski |