| 1 |
В Вск, 18/01/2009 в 00:52 +0100, Friedrich Oslage пишет: |
| 2 |
> Robin H. Johnson schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see |
| 4 |
> > the potential for danger. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> > As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file |
| 7 |
> > like /etc/baselayout2? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
What package will install this file? Also is it possible to save openrc |
| 10 |
${PVR} inside this file? Version is required to introduce workarounds in |
| 11 |
reliable way for openrc versions which does not work with openvz startup |
| 12 |
scripts. Also why not call this files /etc/*openrc*? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > To date, for an init script that has baselayout2-specific behavior, we |
| 15 |
> > have had some variant of [ -e /lib/librc.so ] in the init script. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> Why not teach /sbin/runscript it's own version? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In some cases this will break with openvz. openvz container (CT) |
| 20 |
start/stop scripts need to check openrc existence inside container and |
| 21 |
depending on that generate either openrc or baselayout-1 configuration |
| 22 |
files. This start/stop scripts work in host node (HN) environment and |
| 23 |
since it's possible to have different versions of everything (e.g. libc) |
| 24 |
in HN and CT /sbin/runscript will not work in some cases and thus break |
| 25 |
networking and other things for CT. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Peter. |
Archives