| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 04:13 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> It's not one or the other: it's both. Nobody needs to "win" the |
| 6 |
> maintainership battle here. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Here's how I see it. PMs are responsible for the whole package, including |
| 9 |
> arch-independent and arch-dependent aspects. Independently, PMs work to |
| 10 |
> ensure the arch-independent parts are stable. Together with AMs, the PMs |
| 11 |
> work to ensure the arch-dependent aspects are stable. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Until the day when AMs have equal amounts of time to spend on each package |
| 14 |
> as PMs, I don't see this changing. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Perhaps "win" is too strong of a word. "Precedence" is more what I mean. But |
| 17 |
I can certainly see your point. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- -- |
| 20 |
Jason Huebel |
| 21 |
Gentoo/amd64 Strategic Lead |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer Relations/Recruiter |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
GPG Public Key: |
| 25 |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9BA9E230 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
"Do not weep; do not wax indignant. Understand." |
| 28 |
Baruch Spinoza (1632 - 1677) |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iD8DBQFA2feybNgbbJup4jARAs81AJ9TYrA4VoF+tOmvLDsIoRu/najPoACeKx00 |
| 33 |
1LTbpbtZR8tCdXhqnmHUgog= |
| 34 |
=Iosx |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives