1 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0200 |
2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> OK, would you let me to create a tracker bug for eapi5 accepted item? |
4 |
|
5 |
No. We're working on the PMS list. We don't need yet another place to |
6 |
look. |
7 |
|
8 |
> About suggesting new item (like forcing rebuilding of other packages |
9 |
> as discussed some days ago and crosscompile support suggested by Tommy |
10 |
> today), I guess we need to get them voted by the council? |
11 |
|
12 |
No. You need to get a draft diff for PMS written, along with an |
13 |
implementation in a package mangler of your choice and proof that it |
14 |
works in practice. |
15 |
|
16 |
The plan is we'll present the EAPI 5 branch to the Council and have |
17 |
them vote on each individual feature. Then we'll cherry-pick the ones |
18 |
they approve to master. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |