1 |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > Either way, thoughts? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> It looks like you haven't looked at the python-r1 effort. That means |
6 |
> you probably also aren't subscribed to the gentoo-python mailing list. |
7 |
> I suggest you do both first. :) |
8 |
|
9 |
Yeah, I'm not on the ML- as for the eclass, I read the source; |
10 |
nothing in there in re: to wrappers currently. |
11 |
|
12 |
Only thread I see that is relevant is |
13 |
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.python/11 ; roughly |
14 |
executable wrapper, just what I'm spelling out here is the |
15 |
exact mechanism's of how to do it. |
16 |
|
17 |
Re: python-r1; frankly... if folks are fine w/ the wrapper, I don't |
18 |
want it delayed waiting on python-r1 (or only used there). |
19 |
|
20 |
As I laid out, what I'm proposing can be dropped in *now* for existing |
21 |
python eclass- basically moves that logic out of it and into |
22 |
eselect-python. |
23 |
|
24 |
It'll be faster/saner to maintain, less code in python eclass, and |
25 |
reusable going forward for the new attempts; plus I'm willing to do it |
26 |
(meaning it'll get done in the next week or two). |
27 |
|
28 |
That said; +1 or -1, or some where in between? |
29 |
|
30 |
~harring |