Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: usr merge
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 17:19:59
Message-Id: 20160409121825.7739c5fc@sepulchrave.remarqs
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge by waltdnes@waltdnes.org
1 On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400
2 waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote:
3
4 > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:11:31AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
5 >
6 > > It was simply a recognition that we were already in a state where
7 > > booting a system without /usr mounted early can cause problems.
8 >
9 > For certain edge cases... yes. But they were already using
10 > initramfs or merging /usr into /. I'm talking about the 95% who
11 > don't really need it.
12
13 Booting without /usr mounted early is something Gentoo already doesn't
14 support and can't support, right?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: usr merge waltdnes@××××××××.org
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: usr merge Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>