| 1 |
Am Samstag 06 August 2011, 23:57:13 schrieb Fabio Erculiani: |
| 2 |
> I really love the idea of being able to atomically push updates across |
| 3 |
> multiple CPVs. |
| 4 |
> This is also what KDE, GNOME, and many other teams are waiting for. |
| 5 |
> Having multiple repos means no atomicity and at this point, I would |
| 6 |
> rather prefer CVS (omg!). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Exactly. This is why I would also vote for a single tree and single modern vcs. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
In addition, I would like to propose that we keep the number of required "home-made addons and scripts" to a minimum. As long as we have straight cvs or straight git, every tool developed for these systems just works. As soon as we start assembling our tree with a huge self-made infrastructure, we're all confined to our own tools for every operation that steps over the newly created repository limits. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 15 |
Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex |
| 16 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 17 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives