Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail@×××××.com>
To: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:41:58
Message-Id: aa0abe4c-a6fe-a0ae-2472-8f15a23e7ce9@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass by William Hubbs
1 Hi William,
2
3 How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8?
4
5 Thanks,
6
7 Samuel
8
9 On 5/10/20 10:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
10 > All,
11 >
12 > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
13 > go-module.eclass.
14 >
15 > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
16 > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
17 >
18 > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
19 > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
20 >
21 > Thoughts?
22 >
23 > William Hubbs (1):
24 > eclass/go-module.eclass: remove EGO_VENDOR support
25 >
26 > eclass/go-module.eclass | 81 +++--------------------------------------
27 > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
28 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies