Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:47:29
Message-Id: 200607071640.04502.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) by "Harald van Dijk"
1 On Friday 07 July 2006 12:53, Harald van Dijk wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:00:09PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
3 > > If you take out the stub patches (which incidentally have no impact on
4 > > code generation), many builds will simply fail because they expect the
5 > > additional flags from ssp, htb etc to be there.
6 >
7 > That's the point. I mentioned being able to test whether your own
8 > software compiles with a pure GNU toolchain as a desire. Being able to
9 > see whether unofficial compiler options are used is not just a nice
10 > extra, but even necessary for that.
11
12 as i said, this really is a non-issue considering SSP has been integrated into
13 mainline gcc
14
15 > > Again, if you don't gave GCC_SPECS defined in your environment then
16 > > that patch makes no difference to code generation.
17 >
18 > Yes, but if GCC_SPECS is defined in the environment
19
20 so what's stopping you from undefining it ?
21 -mike