1 |
On Friday 07 July 2006 12:53, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:00:09PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
3 |
> > If you take out the stub patches (which incidentally have no impact on |
4 |
> > code generation), many builds will simply fail because they expect the |
5 |
> > additional flags from ssp, htb etc to be there. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That's the point. I mentioned being able to test whether your own |
8 |
> software compiles with a pure GNU toolchain as a desire. Being able to |
9 |
> see whether unofficial compiler options are used is not just a nice |
10 |
> extra, but even necessary for that. |
11 |
|
12 |
as i said, this really is a non-issue considering SSP has been integrated into |
13 |
mainline gcc |
14 |
|
15 |
> > Again, if you don't gave GCC_SPECS defined in your environment then |
16 |
> > that patch makes no difference to code generation. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Yes, but if GCC_SPECS is defined in the environment |
19 |
|
20 |
so what's stopping you from undefining it ? |
21 |
-mike |