Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Rickard <mjr318@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ProPolice enabled gcc/gentoo and chrooted Apache
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 03:42:14
Message-Id: 20030210223330.2c83fa75.mjr318@psu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ProPolice enabled gcc/gentoo and chrooted Apache by Dylan Carlson
1 >
2 > Awesome. I would love to see propolice become part of the standard gcc
3 > ebuilds. I've been running my own gcc/propolice hacked gcc for a while
4 > on Gentoo; most basic things I've compiled seem to work fine, but it's
5 > not a regular CFLAG for me yet.\
6
7 I'm using it a regular CFLAG on my workstation now. The first issues that
8 need to be ironed out are the portage breaking. If glibc is built
9 with -fstack-protector, portage breaks (but nothing else that I've found),
10 or if portage itself is built with it it also breaks.
11
12 Of course, if these are issues that are not easily fixable, it would be
13 easy enough to simply strip the -fstack-protector flag explicitly in the
14 ebuilds.
15
16 >
17 > This has been an open bug. Please refer to:
18 >
19 > [ http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13610 ]
20 >
21
22 Thanks for pointing that out, I'll keep an eye on it. Do you know what
23 work has been done so far involving implementing this feature? Is it just
24 basically testing at this point?
25
26 -Matt
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies