Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:47
Message-Id: CAJ0EP40tBHH0PavbXGG-g7dmeZ9-VRDuKeve0_Q7E4ctTH9N2Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
3 >
4 >> Title: The default JPEG implementation
5 >
6 > [...]
7 >
8 >> All users are recommended to migrate:
9 >>
10 >> # emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
11 >> # emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
12 >
13 > That of course leaves the system without a jpeg library between the jpeg
14 > unmerge and the completion of the libjpeg-turbo merge.  If the build
15 > process fails for some reason...
16 >
17 > There's no way to use portage's automatic block-resolving ability here to
18 > avoid that, I take it?
19 >
20
21 This works for me.
22
23 floppym@naomi ~ % emerge -pv1 -j1 libjpeg-turbo
24
25 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
26
27 Calculating dependencies... done!
28 [ebuild N ] media-libs/libjpeg-turbo-1.2.0-r1 USE="-java
29 -static-libs" 0 kB
30 [uninstall ] media-libs/jpeg-8d USE="-static-libs"
31 [blocks b ] media-libs/jpeg:0 ("media-libs/jpeg:0" is blocking
32 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo-1.2.0-r1)

Replies