| 1 |
В Вск, 13/07/2008 в 23:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: |
| 2 |
> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand? |
| 3 |
> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope |
| 4 |
> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those |
| 5 |
> two bullet points? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've read all previous discussions but still miss answer to the |
| 8 |
question: Why is it impossible to state that .ebuild extension is for |
| 9 |
bash based ebuild make package manager get and filter EAPIs based on |
| 10 |
EAPI variable? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Note, I assume that we can do not backward-compatible changes in PM, we |
| 13 |
just need to wait enough time to start using it. But taking into account |
| 14 |
that the features that will make use of this GLEP55 are still not so |
| 15 |
evident I don't see any problem to wait. In any case I'd like to |
| 16 |
understand why should we start support this hell of extensions. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Peter. |
Archives