| 1 |
Kyung-hwan Kim wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > > After merging binutils-2.10.1.0.7 and everything gose beautifully. |
| 4 |
> > > But merging glibc-2.2.2, nothing would go its way. |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Do you mean that packages must be recompiled under glibc-2.2.2 and |
| 7 |
> > > updated binutils environment? |
| 8 |
> > No normaly that should not be neccesary. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I finished upgrading glibc to 2.2.2 on a pure rc4_pre2 system. |
| 11 |
I used binutils-2.10.92.0.2 and I had to remove the manually created |
| 12 |
virtual/glibc dir before I merged glibc. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I did not see any segfault yet. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
achim~ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > It seems that the problem is arch dependend. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I use i686-pc-linux-gnu here. The rc4_pre2 packages use |
| 22 |
> > i486-pc-linux-gnu |
| 23 |
> > as default. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > I currently building glibc-2.2.2-r1 with binutils-2.10.92.0.2 on a pure |
| 26 |
> > rc4_pre2 machine. I hope that works. |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > Did the glibc test's fail on your machine when using binutils 2.10.1? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Yes. :) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> > On a i686 target they do. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Kyunghwan |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 39 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives