Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant?
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:59:42
Message-Id: 200911091901.36602.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Monday 09 November 2009 18:45:46 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Monday 09 November 2009 17:52:23 Patrick Lauer wrote:
3 > > On Monday 09 November 2009 21:16:28 Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 > > And talking about glibc ...
5 > >
6 > > For 2.11 you didn't even test if all patches apply (bug #292139)
7 >
8 > this example is bs and you know it. i'm not going to test every USE flag
9 > combo, especially ones that take specific profiles. ignoring that, this is
10 > for configurations that another team handles. i'm not maintaining the
11 > hardening patches.
12 >
13 > > and maybe forgot to upload a patch (#292223)
14 >
15 > yes, i roll so many patch tarballs that i sometimes forget to post some.
16 > and it's not an obvious scenario to me since it emerges fine on my system.
17
18 also, unlike you, i acked/fixed the bugs right away instead of whining on a
19 mailing list over and over that people are making you fix bugs you introduced
20 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature