| 1 |
Wernfried Haas wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:32AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The only problem is that it lists him as contactable by |
| 4 |
>> "nickname@g.o" aka ciaran@g.o which is false. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Also the whole section is called "Developers", not "people who once |
| 7 |
> contributed but aren't developers any more or eventually they are, |
| 8 |
> well you never know for sure, just send an email and see if it |
| 9 |
> bounces". ;-) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> I've actually wondered about this as well since I've been in projects as |
| 12 |
>> a non-dev and Treecleaners has non-devs. Can we get some kind of |
| 13 |
>> modification to the <dev> tag for non-gentoo contributors? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/ |
| 16 |
> Looks like a perfect example how to solve it to me - one section |
| 17 |
> listing the developers and one for contributors who aren't. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> cheers, |
| 20 |
> Wernfried |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Damn you for using my project page against me! :P Phreak wrote that |
| 24 |
part actually ;) I was hoping for a more graceful solution than |
| 25 |
separate sections. At least with regards to cleaners, there are no |
| 26 |
"better" people because they are developers. Only "people with commit |
| 27 |
access to fix stuff" and "people who don't have commit access." is |
| 28 |
really the only (useful) distinction. |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives