1 |
Also there is a quirk in the xemacs configure file: |
2 |
If you have wine installed then it thinks that it is compiling for |
3 |
windows, thus fails. This happens as it detects /usr/lib/libgdi32.so, |
4 |
thus thinking it is windows. |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
> > Has anyone been able to figure out why xemacs segfaults on startup? As |
11 |
> > mentioned before, if you are emerge-ing something, than xemacs will |
12 |
> > actually run w/o segfaulting. This is strange behavior. TIA, Dave |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Which version? |
15 |
> Have you tried |
16 |
> |
17 |
> xemacs -debug-init |
18 |
> xemacs -vanilla |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Also try running in the terminal with |
21 |
> |
22 |
> xemacs -nw |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Perhaps these would help you to pin-point the problem... |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> Arcady Genkin |
27 |
> Don't read everything you believe. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> --__--__-- |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Message: 8 |
32 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff |
33 |
> From: Stacey Keast <slik@×××××××××××.net> |
34 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
35 |
> Date: 07 Apr 2002 23:00:55 -0600 |
36 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
37 |
> |
38 |
> On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:46, Spider wrote: |
39 |
> <snip> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Of course it is going to take gcc3 longer to compile things with the new |
42 |
> profiling code (see http://gcc.gnu.org/news/profiledriven.html) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> All this basically is is the compiler running through code branches and |
45 |
> identifying blocks which should be optimized to produce faster |
46 |
> EXECUTABLES, this does not come at the price of faster COMPILE TIMES, as |
47 |
> the compiler has to build these profiles to do more advanced |
48 |
> optimizations. So, you are really benchmarking the wrong thing here. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> |
51 |
> --__--__-- |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Message: 9 |
54 |
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 07:43:32 +0200 (CEST) |
55 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Progress of kernel patches like grsecurity ? |
56 |
> From: "Kim Nielsen" <kn@××××××××××.dk> |
57 |
> To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
58 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
59 |
> |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> > Take a look at http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk/ |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > It's works fine under Gentoo. |
64 |
> > |
65 |
> But it's not in portage .. I was looking for kernel patches that Gentoo |
66 |
> already has |
67 |
> |
68 |
> /Kim |
69 |
> |
70 |
> |
71 |
> |
72 |
> --__--__-- |
73 |
> |
74 |
> Message: 10 |
75 |
> From: "Mykhaylo Sorochan" <mihan@××××××××××××.ua> |
76 |
> To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
77 |
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:58:07 +0300 |
78 |
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] installing gentoo from i586.iso troubles |
79 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
80 |
> |
81 |
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. |
82 |
> |
83 |
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20 |
84 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; |
85 |
> charset="koi8-r" |
86 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
87 |
> |
88 |
> Hi guys! |
89 |
> |
90 |
> I have some problems in installing the Gentoo. |
91 |
> I've been downloaded i586.iso of Gentoo Linux and tried o install it. I = |
92 |
> have to say that I have access to Internet at my work and install Gentoo = |
93 |
> on my home machine. |
94 |
> So I have made all steps till making a boot and kernel. The problem is = |
95 |
> that /etc/make.profile (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0) is absent and = |
96 |
> emerge doesn't work. It seems that stage2(3)-i586 are incomplete. How I = |
97 |
> can fix it without downloading anything from my home machine. Where I = |
98 |
> can get that file and what else is absent there? |
99 |
> |
100 |
> Thank you. |
101 |
> Regards, Misha Sorochan. |
102 |
> |
103 |
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20 |
104 |
> Content-Type: text/html; |
105 |
> charset="koi8-r" |
106 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
107 |
> |
108 |
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> |
109 |
> <HTML><HEAD> |
110 |
> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dkoi8-r" http-equiv=3DContent-Type> |
111 |
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=3DGENERATOR> |
112 |
> <STYLE></STYLE> |
113 |
> </HEAD> |
114 |
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> |
115 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Hi guys!</FONT></DIV> |
116 |
> <DIV> </DIV> |
117 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>I have some problems in = |
118 |
> installing the=20 |
119 |
> Gentoo.</FONT></DIV> |
120 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>I've been downloaded i586.iso of = |
121 |
> Gentoo Linux=20 |
122 |
> and tried o install it. I have to say that I have access to Internet at = |
123 |
> my work=20 |
124 |
> and install Gentoo on my home machine.</FONT></DIV> |
125 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>So I have made all steps = |
126 |
> till making a=20 |
127 |
> boot and kernel. The problem is that /etc/make.profile=20 |
128 |
> (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0) is absent and emerge doesn't work. = |
129 |
> It seems=20 |
130 |
> that stage2(3)-i586 are incomplete. How I can fix it without downloading = |
131 |
> |
132 |
> anything from my home machine. Where I can get that file and what else = |
133 |
> is absent=20 |
134 |
> there?</FONT></DIV> |
135 |
> <DIV> </DIV> |
136 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial CYR" size=3D2>Thank you.</FONT></DIV> |
137 |
> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial Cyr" size=3D2>Regards, Misha=20 |
138 |
> Sorochan.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> |
139 |
> |
140 |
> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C1DEDB.804E3E20-- |
141 |
> |
142 |
> |
143 |
> --__--__-- |
144 |
> |
145 |
> Message: 11 |
146 |
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:18:08 +0200 |
147 |
> From: Spider <spider@g.o> |
148 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
149 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3 Vs GCC 2 and some other stuff |
150 |
> Organization: Chaotic |
151 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
152 |
> |
153 |
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy |
154 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
155 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
156 |
> |
157 |
> No, I'm not. :) |
158 |
> |
159 |
> the "benchmark" as such was in response to peoples questions on wether |
160 |
> gcc3.0 was faster or slower during compilation than gcc2.9 |
161 |
> |
162 |
> For my own use, I think the results are well worth it now with gcc |
163 |
> 3.0.4, especially since gcc now can be used to compile the kernel ;) |
164 |
> (bugfix in gcc304) |
165 |
> |
166 |
> please take this the right way, I'm well aware of the improved results |
167 |
> of gcc3 compared to gcc 2.9 , and why the slowdowns occur. (Check the |
168 |
> memory usage of -Wall and other things and you'll be surprised) |
169 |
> |
170 |
> |
171 |
> //Spider |
172 |
> |
173 |
> |
174 |
> begin quote |
175 |
> On 07 Apr 2002 23:00:55 -0600 |
176 |
> Stacey Keast <slik@×××××××××××.net> wrote: |
177 |
> |
178 |
> > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:46, Spider wrote: |
179 |
> > <snip> |
180 |
> > |
181 |
> > Of course it is going to take gcc3 longer to compile things with the |
182 |
> > new profiling code (see http://gcc.gnu.org/news/profiledriven.html) |
183 |
> > |
184 |
> > All this basically is is the compiler running through code branches |
185 |
> > and identifying blocks which should be optimized to produce faster |
186 |
> > EXECUTABLES, this does not come at the price of faster COMPILE TIMES, |
187 |
> > as the compiler has to build these profiles to do more advanced |
188 |
> > optimizations. So, you are really benchmarking the wrong thing here. |
189 |
> > |
190 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
191 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
192 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
193 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
194 |
> |
195 |
> |
196 |
> -- |
197 |
> begin happy99.exe |
198 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
199 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
200 |
> end |
201 |
> |
202 |
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy |
203 |
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature |
204 |
> |
205 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
206 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) |
207 |
> |
208 |
> iD8DBQE8sTYhXNNftdcUD70RAi2AAKCN18P8RHFi5BB9ttQxyXLOghL4iQCfYzoM |
209 |
> wo4g0qSIHIzOPz9hpviKRxo= |
210 |
> =YK+Z |
211 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
212 |
> |
213 |
> --=.OV,BdVR8_98KPy-- |
214 |
> |
215 |
> |
216 |
> --__--__-- |
217 |
> |
218 |
> Message: 12 |
219 |
> From: George Shapovalov <georges@×××××××××××.edu> |
220 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
221 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] installing gentoo from i586.iso troubles |
222 |
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 23:36:04 -0700 |
223 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
224 |
> |
225 |
> On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:58, Mykhaylo Sorochan wrote: |
226 |
> > Hi guys! |
227 |
> > |
228 |
> > I have some problems in installing the Gentoo. |
229 |
> > I've been downloaded i586.iso of Gentoo Linux and tried o install it. I |
230 |
> > have to say that I have access to Internet at my work and install Gento= |
231 |
> o on |
232 |
> > my home machine. So I have made all steps till making a boot and kernel= |
233 |
> =2E |
234 |
> > The problem is that /etc/make.profile (/usr/portage/profiles/default-1.= |
235 |
> 0) |
236 |
> So, does that mean that the link is in place? (if no you need to create i= |
237 |
> t=20 |
238 |
> anyway) and this is portage which is absent? |
239 |
> Under normal conditions I would tell you do: |
240 |
> emerge rsync (or even better emerge --clean rsync if you did that step at= |
241 |
> some=20 |
242 |
> point already). Since you do not have Internet access at home you need to= |
243 |
> =20 |
244 |
> download portage tree and unpack it under /usr (so that /usr/portage is=20 |
245 |
> created). |
246 |
> You can get it here: |
247 |
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/snapshots. |
248 |
> Please also check faq for more advice on how to use gentoo without a (fas= |
249 |
> t)=20 |
250 |
> connection at home. |
251 |
> |
252 |
> George |
253 |
> |
254 |
> |
255 |
> |
256 |
> --__--__-- |
257 |
> |
258 |
> Message: 13 |
259 |
> From: thomas.mitzkat@××××××××.de (Thomas Mitzkat) |
260 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
261 |
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 06:14:57 +0000 |
262 |
> Subject: [gentoo-dev] forbidden su under x |
263 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
264 |
> |
265 |
> hello, |
266 |
> |
267 |
> i don't find the switch to enable su in grafical terminal or to give |
268 |
> root-password to change time or date. please send me an info where i can |
269 |
> enable this, because this is not so pratice. |
270 |
> |
271 |
> thanks a lot - fine system - |
272 |
> |
273 |
> |
274 |
> thomas |
275 |
> |
276 |
> |
277 |
> --__--__-- |
278 |
> |
279 |
> Message: 14 |
280 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] forbidden su under x |
281 |
> From: Jens Blaesche <mr.big@××××××××××.de> |
282 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
283 |
> Date: 08 Apr 2002 10:00:39 +0200 |
284 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
285 |
> |
286 |
> Am Mon, 2002-04-08 um 08.14 schrieb Thomas Mitzkat: |
287 |
> > hello, |
288 |
> > |
289 |
> > i don't find the switch to enable su in grafical terminal or to give |
290 |
> > root-password to change time or date. please send me an info where i can |
291 |
> > enable this, because this is not so pratice. |
292 |
> > |
293 |
> > thanks a lot - fine system - |
294 |
> > |
295 |
> > |
296 |
> > thomas |
297 |
> Put the User in Group Wheel. |
298 |
> |
299 |
> usermod -G wheel whateveruseryouwanttoadd |
300 |
> |
301 |
> J. |
302 |
> |
303 |
> |
304 |
> |
305 |
> --__--__-- |
306 |
> |
307 |
> _______________________________________________ |
308 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
309 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
310 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
311 |
> |
312 |
> |
313 |
> End of gentoo-dev Digest |
314 |
-- |
315 |
Stefan Jones |
316 |
Flat. 4, 46 Gold Street, Wellingborough, Northants, NN8 4QT |
317 |
email: stefanajones@××××××××××.com |
318 |
tel: 01933 272991 |
319 |
mobile: 07900 432809 |