Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

[Michał Górny]

Dnia 17 lutego 2016 08:52:31 CET, Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@g.o> napisał(a):
>On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
>wrote:
>
>> The games team was pretty much formed of two kinds of developers back
>then. One kind was retired developers, the other kind was developers
>who did what they cared about and ignored everything and everyone else.
>Bugs, join requests, complaints, all went ignored and games team kept
>silent claim to games in gentoo.
>
>False and slanderous.
>
>> So the first Council case against games team was that they did not
>accept any new members. Or rather, silently ignored join requests. They
>also ignored inquiries wrt the case and the Council.
>
>Also false.
>
>> The result was that the Council set up someone external to take care
>of inviting new members, and electing new team lead afterwards. As it
>could be predicted, nobody wanted to join, or rather be forced into the
>team they weren't welcome in.
>
>Speculative and false.
>
>> Then the case against policies started. The first abolished myth was
>games team sole claim to games in gentoo. Where Council pretty much
>only confirmed that they have no right for that and everyone can
>maintain game ebuilds without having games team approval or
>co-maintenance.
>
>Making things up.
>
>
>> During the whole process, I don't recall a single reply from games
>team member.
>
>Well, here's at least one.
>
>However, I'm not sure why anyone would reply to your drama, slander,
>and lies so I'm not surprised that's been your experience.

Nice to hear from you. Please don't expect me to write things I didn't know about.

So maybe games team did reply. To the people that were worthy replying to. Did this group include the Council or QA team?

As I see it, this only adds to your case. Ignoring messages is inappropriate at least. Ignoring them in order to stall others from doing their Gentoo work is more serious.



-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny (by phone)