Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: updates for bzr.eclass | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:06:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 19792.24170.525983.503450@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: updates for bzr.eclass by James Cloos |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011, James Cloos wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | UM> 1) initial branch with "bzr branch --no-tree", |
| 4 | UM> 2) subsequent updates with "bzr pull", |
| 5 | UM> 3) export to ${WORKDIR} with "bzr export". |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > I applaud those changes, |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Thanks. :) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > but please mv(1) old repos rather than rm(1)ing them; bandwidth is |
| 12 | > often more of a premium than storage and a manual cleanup is better |
| 13 | > than a magic behind-the-back permanent deletion. This follows the |
| 14 | > same principles as portage does in $DISTFILES. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Is the following better? |
| 17 | <https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/changeset?reponame=&new=1609%40emacs-overlay%2Feclass%2Fbzr.eclass&old=1608%40emacs-overlay%2Feclass%2Fbzr.eclass> |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: updates for bzr.eclass | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |