| 1 |
On 9/9/15 4:00 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:23:24 +0200 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I don't see any references to upstream bug reports, and so no evidence |
| 4 |
>> of upstream being uncooperative. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Are there any public links that you could share? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Sorry, I forgot about the mails I sent to samba upstream [1] |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [1] |
| 11 |
> http://samba-technical.samba.narkive.com/9UGYmeiG/patch-samba-4-0-automagically-depends-on-dmapi-libdm-so |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I see. I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly without more |
| 14 |
context. These are my reactions to above thread: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
1. All people who replied are listed on |
| 17 |
<https://www.samba.org/samba/team/> . To me this means it's indeed |
| 18 |
"official" upstream response. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
2. Upstream is indeed initially confused. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
3. After reading the reference to |
| 23 |
<https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Automagic_dependencies>, |
| 24 |
they point to "--with{out,}-pam, --with{out,}-aio-support and |
| 25 |
--with{out,}-attr" flags. Notably, dmapi is not mentioned. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
4. At that point I'd expect a reply from you Lars, that since they have |
| 28 |
flags for other libraries but not dmapi (or the dmapi ones don't work - |
| 29 |
and provide steps to repro), why wouldn't they take the patch. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
5. In fact, <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474492> from your |
| 32 |
original post links to upstream |
| 33 |
<https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10369> with a slightly |
| 34 |
different patch that apparently has been landed. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Paweł |
Archives