| 1 |
On Saturday 05 January 2013 15:29:05 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> |
| 4 |
wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> Even if you're not a business you should care about maintainable |
| 6 |
> >> solutions. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I'm sure at the time it was created (12+ years ago) the website looked |
| 9 |
> > pretty maintainable :) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Hence the reason we should strongly consider a mainstream CMS. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I don't have a problem with somebody wanting to spend a lot of time |
| 14 |
> making something fancy for us - we're all volunteers. The problem is |
| 15 |
> that the satisfaction of having built something new and shiny tends to |
| 16 |
> wear off, and then it ends up having to be maintained by people who |
| 17 |
> could care less how fancy the engine behind it is. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Rich |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
This, "The problem is that the satisfaction of having built something new and |
| 22 |
shiny tends to wear off, and then it ends up having to be maintained by people |
| 23 |
who could care less how fancy the engine behind it is." |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Aaron |
Archives