Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Alberto G. Hierro" <fiam@××××××××××.org> (by way of Alberto G. Hierro <fiam@××××××××××.org>)
To: Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:23:32
Message-Id: 200309130126.15934.fiam@asturlinux.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi all list,
5
6 I emerged pfeifer-sources-2.4.21-r1_pre4 using ~x86 as ACCEPT_KEYWORDS
7 (default in my system is x86) a few hours ago. Now, I've just synced and
8 typed 'emerge -DpUv world' and this is the output from emerge:
9
10 ixnay root # emerge -DpUv world
11
12 >>> --upgradeonly implies --update... adding --update to options.
13
14 These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
15
16 Calculating world dependencies ...done!
17 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/coreutils-5.0-r3 [4.5.11-r1] +nls -build -selinux
18 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/debianutils-1.16.7-r3 [1.16.7-r2] -static -build
19 [ebuild U ] sys-kernel/pfeifer-sources-2.4.20.1_pre11 [2.4.21.1_pre4]
20 - - -build +crypt -evms2 -aavm -usagi -doc +tcltk
21 [ebuild U ] app-admin/gkrellm-2.1.16 [2.1.15] +gtk +gtk2 +nls
22 [ebuild U ] x11-themes/gentoo-artwork-0.3 [0.2] +kde
23
24
25 Why is pfeifer-sources going to be downgraded (i used -U) and why emerge
26 shows it as an upgrade? Is this a bug or is the expected behaviour?
27 2.4.20.1_pre11 > 2.4.21.1_pre4 ?
28
29 Regards,
30
31 /* Alberto G. Hierro (Skyhusker) */
32 /* Linux User #298867 */
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
35
36 iD8DBQE/YlYV4O6JklHkL2cRAhYsAJ9kFGmPXWLzwjXDDYvTWx8ss1BYjwCeNxeI
37 SsK37DmNZfWiC3rC/OcaG1k=
38 =BFhF
39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
40
41
42 --
43 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>