Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] ebuild policy questions.
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:30:48
Message-Id: wxxk7rern9k.fsf@nommo.uio.no
1 hi all, thanks for a great distro!
2
3 now, I'm in the process of trying to contribute a little, in effect
4 making some ebuilds. now, the technical writing of the builds isn't
5 a problem, yet, it's more a few things I wonder about policy-wise.
6
7 first off, if I see an ebuild that is out of date, do I contact the
8 author of the out-of-date ebuild or do I submit a new one? so far
9 I've thought "if the old one is _really_ out of date, I'll submit a
10 new ebuild, if it's a week or two since the new version came out,
11 I'll take it with the author." the real question is probably how
12 "possessive" authors are / are supposed to be with regards to their
13 ebuilds. is there any set policy on this?
14
15 second, and a bit more tricky. I thought I'd make an xgammon
16 ebuild. all fine and dandy, but there are a few patches (from
17 RedHat) to xgammon which are nice to have (they fix minor bugs --
18 void main -> int main and a few other things). what to do? if I
19 include the patches, how do I link to them? or do I just put them
20 in the "files"-directory with the ebuild?
21
22 anyhow, thanks for your time, hopefully you won't need to thump my
23 head too many times in the future.
24
25 --
26 Terje - a very happy Gentoo-user, hopefully contributing a little
27 eventually.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild policy questions. "Tod M. Neidt" <tod@g.o>