| 1 |
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 22:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> You are correct. However, it might be necessary to patch something that |
| 3 |
> won't compile with icc, but does compile with gcc. I think this is the |
| 4 |
> primary reason for the icc USE flag. |
| 5 |
Isn't tc-* functions there also for this? |
| 6 |
And anyway, there can be patches which makes something work both with icc and |
| 7 |
gcc. |
| 8 |
When I worked a bit with icc, I found out that it was just stricter than gcc, |
| 9 |
but all the changes needed to be done for icc was right also for gcc (and |
| 10 |
usually stopped gcc from throw a warning on something). |
| 11 |
Probably with gcc4 many of the errors are now shared by both compilers as it |
| 12 |
turned up even more strict than before. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 16 |
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
Archives