Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tomáš Chvátal" <tomas.chvatal@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:44:10
Message-Id: 8143146.7300HEgFsT@arcarius
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates by "Paweł Hajdan
1 Dne So 12. ledna 2013 14:49:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
2 > Please review attached automatically generated stabilization candidates
3 > for January.
4 >
5 > I don't want to annoy people with automatically filed bugs, and at the
6 > same time I also received lots of positive feedback about the effort to
7 > keep the stable tree more up-to-date.
8 >
9 > I think the best way to proceed is to listen to that feedback and
10 > continue the effort, while also keeping an updated list of exclusions
11 > for packagers/herds that are actively stabilized by maintainers.
12 >
13 > Paweł
14
15 Hmm, nice idea but how about expanding metadata.xml with something like info
16 for stabilisations so they can be automatically grabbed for it. Quite few
17 software is just nice enough that it can go automatically for stable in 30
18 days, and someone could just go then and open new bugs (with assigned arches)
19 based on it (of course it expects brain from the guy reporting it that he
20 checks if there are no open bugs).
21
22 Because mails to -dev are frankly annoying. :-)
23
24 Tom

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates Mike Pagano <mpagano@g.o>