| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:21 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/10/2015 08:15 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> tldr: If the problem is USE flags, let's talk USE flags. If it's |
| 5 |
>> supporting more than one toolkit in general, I see no reason not to |
| 6 |
>> let maintainers use their discretion and not force their hand in |
| 7 |
>> either direction. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> We have provided several arguments here repeatedly. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well, right now the status quo is that this is up to maintainers. |
| 14 |
There is no policy that states otherwise. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The USE flag issue is on the next council agenda, though I'm not |
| 17 |
really confident that we'll resolve it in one go - there are only a |
| 18 |
few days before the meeting. If anybody has concerns about the |
| 19 |
approach that we take I'd suggest posting them on the thread, but I |
| 20 |
suspect that most likely the council will go around the circle and |
| 21 |
assess where everybody generally stands, then propose something more |
| 22 |
solid for a vote the following meeting (which gives everybody an |
| 23 |
opportunity to shoot holes it in beforehand). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives