1 |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:56:58 -0400 |
2 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug |
5 |
> assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo |
6 |
> Policy. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or |
9 |
> stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the |
10 |
> herd/maintainer of said package with all requested arches being CCed. |
11 |
> Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is |
12 |
> acceptable and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to |
13 |
> re-assign the bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that |
14 |
> arch from CC. They should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the |
15 |
> bug. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Once the last remaining arch has completed the bug, it is up to them |
18 |
> to close it. They know it's up to them to close it since the bug is |
19 |
> assigned directly to them. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> This helps keep bugzilla tidy and makes it easy to identify |
22 |
> stabilization/keywording requests which are a priority for that arch |
23 |
> to take care of. |
24 |
|
25 |
I couldn't agree with you more, it's only and correct way to handle |
26 |
these bugs. I have recently gone thru some bugs and did just that. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |