| 1 |
i admit i dont know how to check for those, if i would it was a none |
| 2 |
issue, from what i read i agree that it is binary driver issue, i talked |
| 3 |
with seemant about it, but don't want to work on his ebuild more than |
| 4 |
adding the line spanky suggested from 56702 |
| 5 |
this will keep things sane till he comes up with a permanent fix |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
or more likely till nvidia comes out with newer drivers , everyone jumps |
| 8 |
on those and problem goes magically away |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
binaries are always fun |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>On Monday 13 September 2004 12:33 am, Daniel Goller wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>>added -mno-sse2 conditionally to xorg CFLAGS with gcc 3.4 till this is |
| 20 |
>>sorted out, since we have pentium4, pentium-m and amd64 users with |
| 21 |
>>problems and all three of those cpus have sse2 |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>xorg working fine w/ amd64 here... reading the comments, it seems that this is |
| 26 |
>a nVidia-binary-related bug, not really so much an xorg bug. Perhaps somehow |
| 27 |
>make it conditional on usage of such drivers? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
>>Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>>>On Sunday 12 September 2004 07:49 pm, Patrick Dawson wrote: |
| 35 |
>>> |
| 36 |
>>> |
| 37 |
>>>>It seems to affect many/most using xorg-x11 with -march=pentium4. |
| 38 |
>>>> |
| 39 |
>>>> |
| 40 |
>>>it's sse2 code, not pentium4 |
| 41 |
>>>-mike |
| 42 |
>>> |
| 43 |
>>> |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives