Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: konstantinos Dolkas <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: manson@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:51:39
Message-Id: 004001c2a5d3$1a505530$c00c460a@pro.tl.thomcorp.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by konstantinos Dolkas
1 Rodney,
2
3 Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
4
5 Tom Veldhouse
6
7 ----- Original Message -----
8 From: "konstantinos Dolkas" <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>
9 To: <gentoo-dev@g.o>
10 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:56 AM
11 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
12
13
14 Óôéò Ôñé 17 Äåê 2002 15:18, ï/ç Ragnar Hojland Espinosa Ýãñáøå:
15 > After emerging portage, trying to emerge anything killed the system. It
16 > turned out that gcc and cpp had changed to a script like
17 >
18 > cat gcc
19 > #!/bin/sh
20 > gcc "$@"
21 >
22 > I assume its because of the rm-f typo in ebuild.sh
23
24 We 've had the same problem as well
25
26 3 pc's that downloaded portage from 2 different sites....
27
28 I am fear there is a hoax of some kind
29
30
31 cheers,
32
33 Konstantinos
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
37
38
39
40 --
41 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>