1 |
On Friday, September 16, 2011 06:06:35 PM Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Joost Roeleveld posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:36:27 +0200 as excerpted: |
3 |
> > I agree, I just used this example to explain that it shouldn't be |
4 |
> > necessary to force an initramfs on all users just because there is a |
5 |
> > small group who wants to have an extreme setup. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Careful with the "extreme". As you no doubt realize by now, the udev |
8 |
> folks apparently consider anyone wanting a separate /usr but not an initr* |
9 |
> "extreme". That'd certainly apply double if said admin (since no simple |
10 |
> "user" cares about such stuff, in this view) had /usr on lvm. |
11 |
|
12 |
Yes, I've noticed that. |
13 |
|
14 |
Except that Redhat and Centos use LVM by default. Which will also mean that |
15 |
"simple users" also end up using LVM. |
16 |
Then again, they also end up with an initr* and a generic kernel for |
17 |
everything under the sun. |
18 |
I haven't properly looked at the kernel-configs from redhat lately, but I |
19 |
don't think they include all the possible hardware options be default? |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Joost |