1 |
Raúl Porcel a écrit : |
2 |
> So, firefox-3, seamonkey-2, thunderbird-3 and other mozilla products |
3 |
> will be using xulrunner-1.9, which is the codebase the mozilla products |
4 |
> are based on. In fact, everytime you emerge any of those apps, you're |
5 |
> compiling xulrunner, which takes 90% of the time to build. The good |
6 |
> thing about those new versions, is that they'll be capable of using the |
7 |
> xulrunner library installed of the system. So you only have to build |
8 |
> xulrunner once, and you could build firefox-3, seamonkey-2, |
9 |
> thunderbird-3 against it, and firefox-3 takes less than two minutes to |
10 |
> build with shared xulrunner. |
11 |
|
12 |
Brilliant! I thought they had dropped the idea of using xulrunner. Great |
13 |
to hear this! |
14 |
|
15 |
> Since firefox-3 seems usable now, i was thinking on adding it to the |
16 |
> tree, however that'll need to add net-libs/xulrunner-1.9. Some apps use |
17 |
> xulrunner at the moment[3], instead of building against firefox or |
18 |
> thunderbird or seamonkey. Xulrunner is not mandatory to build firefox-3, |
19 |
> in fact you can build firefox only with the current ebuilds in the overlay. |
20 |
|
21 |
Do firefox and seamonkey still provide their own gtkmoz-embed? Are they |
22 |
still different (ie, almost the same, but not quite entirely 100% the |
23 |
same, although if you look at them they really look the same, but really |
24 |
they're not?) |
25 |
|
26 |
My other question is this, can't we do a big community thing à la Bug |
27 |
Day where we make sure that all the apps that currently have |
28 |
firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner use flags all build against xulrunner 1.9 |
29 |
and drop all other keywords for the sake of simplicity? |
30 |
|
31 |
Anyhow, I'd say mask ff3 and xulrunner 1.9. Better fix things for real |
32 |
instead of having our own hand-made workarounds. |
33 |
|
34 |
Cheers, |
35 |
|
36 |
Rémi |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |