Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:01:12
Message-Id: 20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
2 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
3
4 > Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
5 > > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs
6 > > commit twice with cvs.
7 >
8 > But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already
9 > pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything
10 > but.
11
12 Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
13 the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
14
15
16 jer

Replies