From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | ||
Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:01:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> |
1 | On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC) |
2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted: |
5 | > > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs |
6 | > > commit twice with cvs. |
7 | > |
8 | > But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already |
9 | > pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything |
10 | > but. |
11 | |
12 | Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with |
13 | the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | jer |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |