1 |
Hi Ron, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sunday 17 August 2003 11:09 pm, Ron O'Hara wrote: |
4 |
> If it were possible to 'tag' the portage tree with labels at regular |
5 |
> intervals, and and do an 'emerge sync' with a nominated 'tag' - then you |
6 |
> would have the equivelant of the fixed points that other distributions |
7 |
> have when they cut a release CD. |
8 |
|
9 |
It's an interesting idea ;-) |
10 |
|
11 |
You might want to have a look at running your own (internal) rsync mirror for |
12 |
your Gentoo boxes - and your own (internal) distfiles mirror too. This gives |
13 |
you complete control over what ebuilds your many Gentoo machines will get, |
14 |
and ensures that you can roll out software long after it has been removed |
15 |
from Gentoo's portage (we delete 'old' files all the time, when we believe |
16 |
they're obsolete, which really screws up consistency across a large |
17 |
deployment. However, with your own internal mirror, you can keep these |
18 |
ebuilds and their distfiles around long after Gentoo has dropped them!) |
19 |
|
20 |
Tbh, it's a hack, rather than a nice solid server/client enterprise-ready |
21 |
Portage solution, but it's one that does work. |
22 |
|
23 |
Best regards, |
24 |
Stu |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
27 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
28 |
Beta packages for download http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/packages/ |
29 |
Come and meet me in March 2004 http://www.phparch.com/cruise/ |
30 |
|
31 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
32 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
33 |
-- |