1 |
Open Source/GPL , free meaning no $$ needed, or gotta-pay for it, it doesn't |
2 |
matter as long as the tool you're using is the right tool for the job. |
3 |
|
4 |
If you insist on using the wrong tools ONLY because you think it is |
5 |
un-ethical to use non-free software, you should reconsider your priorities. |
6 |
|
7 |
After all, if you had to rent a specific tool (i.e. ball-joint splitter) to |
8 |
work on your car, or use what common tools (i.e. a hammer) you have laying |
9 |
around your house, what would you do ? |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
> Another option is to migrate to an alternate forums package. |
14 |
> Specifically, vBulletin, which has proven to be quite |
15 |
> scalable and effective with larger sites. The main drawback |
16 |
> to this is the fact that it is a commercial software package, |
17 |
> which tends to raise the ire of some of the more zealous GNU |
18 |
> folks out there. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> So, my question to you is, how would you feel if we were to |
21 |
> do this? Horribly offended? Saddened because there isn't a |
22 |
> GPL'd program to meet our needs, but pragmatic about the need |
23 |
> to do *something*? Or C, none of the above? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Basically, the choice comes down to one of two things: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> 1) Lose some older posts and stay on a GPL-compatible package |
28 |
> 2) Move to a commercial solution and keep all the posts. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Note that vBulletin *is* open source in that you have access |
31 |
> to the source code and can modify it. It's just not Free. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Finally, to keep this process somewhat manageably, I ask that |
34 |
> you make your responses on the forums. I've also set up a |
35 |
> poll there so we can vote on what should be done. I will |
36 |
> likely limit my responses to that discussion. |
37 |
> |
38 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=554174 |
39 |
|
40 |
--kurt |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |