| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 26/10/11 10:20 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 5 |
> I was browsing toolchain.eclass and noticed this: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> if [[ ${PN} != "kgcc64" && ${PN} != gcc-* ]] ; then |
| 8 |
> ... |
| 9 |
> [[ -n ${SPECS_VER} ]] && IUSE+=" nossp" |
| 10 |
> ... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> if tc_version_is_at_least 3 ; then |
| 13 |
> ... |
| 14 |
> if tc_version_is_at_least "4.4" ; then |
| 15 |
> IUSE+=" graphite" |
| 16 |
> [[ -n ${SPECS_VER} ]] && IUSE+=" nossp" |
| 17 |
> fi |
| 18 |
> ... |
| 19 |
> fi |
| 20 |
> fi |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The second IUSE+=" nossp" seems redundant and could be removed, right? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
'nossp' is in IUSE twice within my copy of portage's metadata/cache file |
| 26 |
for gcc, so it would seem there are at least some cases where it is |
| 27 |
redundant. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk6oLx0ACgkQAJxUfCtlWe2S9QD+K9nyvwsajNXvLRQnzFQJ+mVh |
| 35 |
Gb16haS0Yy321JEusmsBANSBq6RrODFyGb9q5KIIxf5ZWfopWqAC/63Zwg5MRJU5 |
| 36 |
=jcLT |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives