1 |
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 19:04, m h wrote: |
2 |
> I'm the OT. So I apologize to all devs whose precious time I have |
3 |
> wasted. This post has probably now consumed about 10x as much time as |
4 |
> it should've by now. I totally realize that it is probably super |
5 |
> annoying to get requests for bumping to stable. And it wasn't my |
6 |
> intention at all to put pressure on anyone to bump KDE. I was only |
7 |
> curious as to what was holding it up. |
8 |
|
9 |
You didn't waste time at all. While your question might have been rather |
10 |
concise I found it topical enough, and proper. The one wasting our time is |
11 |
Stephen P. Becker by behaving a gentoo developer unworthy, and being called |
12 |
upon that. He's also forgetting that while one could try asking it at |
13 |
gentoo-user, the chances of getting an answer from the developers are very |
14 |
thin. |
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
> That was my bad for phrasing my question in such a sort manner (not |
18 |
> following the "howto ask smart questions" protocol). I figured since, |
19 |
> I'm seeing posts about 2.6.16 going stable in "2-3 weeks" and |
20 |
> questions about firefox 1.5, then KDE would be kosher as well (since |
21 |
> it is arguable on of the most important apps on the linux desktop). |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > >> I would like to point out that it was you who flamed me for apparently |
24 |
> > >> saying RTFM, when in fact if you read my original email, I did nothing |
25 |
> > >> of the sort. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > You gave a logical RTFM. You're being literal with words when the |
28 |
> > > meaning of what you said should be fairly clear. You didn't want to |
29 |
> > > answer the question, so you flamed the person who asked instead of |
30 |
> > > answering or defering to a more helpful individual. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > Not really. I should have actually pointed out that there is no (good) |
33 |
> > place for such queries originally, but I was doing about 10 things at |
34 |
> > once, and just sent the typical "don't send offtopic stuff to the |
35 |
> > gentoo-dev list" reply. Look back through the archives...this is pretty |
36 |
> > standard. |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > >> I merely pointed out what should have been clear to anyone |
39 |
> > >> that signed up for this list, that it is not for whining about arch |
40 |
> > >> keywording. |
41 |
> > > |
42 |
> > > Not everyone is like you. There are all sorts of different people out |
43 |
> > > there who process information in a lot of different ways. Without a |
44 |
> > > stated correct place for asking questions about keywording, it wouldn't |
45 |
> > > be hard to rationalise that the proper place is the dev mailing list. |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > Except that it isn't the proper place. It is for discussion of |
48 |
> > technical matters concerning the development of Gentoo. The closest |
49 |
> > place that might be sort of on-topic is the gentoo-desktop list, but I |
50 |
> > generally don't recommend that list because it seems like nobody bothers |
51 |
> > to answer questions there for the most part. I think the problem is |
52 |
> > that the RightPeople(TM) (meaning all the members of the teams for each |
53 |
> > desktop herd) probably aren't subscribed there. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Sorry I'm not on the desktop list and since I was seeing other posts |
56 |
> about marking the kernel and firefox as stable, I figured kde fit in |
57 |
> as well. My bad. One solution to naggers like me may be to have |
58 |
> dedicated per package wiki/homepages where a status is shown (much |
59 |
> like Trac releases). Or at least link to pending bugs. Though I |
60 |
> realize that this is probably just more overhead for devs who are |
61 |
> already too busy and would rather just code. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> > > You say it should be obvious like it's fact. Not everything is obvious |
64 |
> > > to everyone--Not everyone is a Steve or Stephanie. They may interpret |
65 |
> > > conveyed information in different ways and the ambiguity does not help |
66 |
> > > at all. |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> > It should be obvious to anybody who bothered to read the description for |
69 |
> > this mailing list before signing up. I can't fix ignorance. |
70 |
> |
71 |
> Thanks for the compliment ;) |
72 |
> "General Gentoo developer discussion mailing list" is the |
73 |
> description... I guess my post was not general enough. ;) |
74 |
|
75 |
You are right, the list is about the development of gentoo. Asking what the |
76 |
reasons are why kde is not stabilized yet (while it used to be really fast) |
77 |
is totally relevant to that. The list is intentionally not developer only. It |
78 |
is a place for the interaction between developers and advanced users on what |
79 |
happens in gentoo. It's not for flames ;-). |
80 |
|
81 |
Paul |
82 |
|
83 |
-- |
84 |
Paul de Vrieze |
85 |
Gentoo Developer |
86 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
87 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |