| 1 |
> On 4 Jan 2022, at 00:29, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam |
| 6 |
>> shared, does not make sense to be togglable. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6 |
| 10 |
> support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk |
| 11 |
> for pretty much anyone in the United States. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Obviously for such cases, the flag should be kept. But that's not |
| 15 |
the case for plenty of packages. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best, |
| 18 |
sam |
Archives