| 1 |
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 10:40 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail |
| 5 |
> addresses |
| 6 |
> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of |
| 7 |
> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a |
| 8 |
> few |
| 9 |
> developers are using some other addresses. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Using non-@g.o e-mail addresses generally causes problems |
| 12 |
> in accounting for commits. For example, our retirement scripts can't |
| 13 |
> detect commits made using non-Gentoo e-mail address. My dev-timeline |
| 14 |
> scripts [1] account for all emails in LDAP (which doesn't cover all |
| 15 |
> addresses developers use). FWIK gkeys accounts for all addresses |
| 16 |
> in the OpenPGP key UIDs. In my opinion, that's a lot of hoops to |
| 17 |
> jump |
| 18 |
> through to workaround bad practice. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Therefore, I'd like to start enforcing (at the level of the hook |
| 21 |
> verifying signatures) that all commits made to gentoo.git (and other |
| 22 |
> repositories requiring dev signatures) are made using @gentoo.org e- |
| 23 |
> mail |
| 24 |
> address (for committer field). |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use |
| 27 |
> non-@g.o address when committing? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> [1]:https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+1 |
Archives