Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:35:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4692B68E.6040808@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Zac Medico kirjoitti: |
| 2 | > Hi everyone, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Bug 174380 [1] has a growing list of features that may be included in EAPI-1. |
| 5 | > Some of the features are already implemented but can't be used in the portage |
| 6 | > tree until we do an EAPI bump. The ones that are currently implemented include |
| 7 | > slot deps [2] and iuse defaults [3]. Are these features important enough to |
| 8 | > warrant an EAPI bump or should we wait for more features to materialize? |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I know Java would heavily use slot deps. What is the ETA for use based |
| 12 | depends? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Regards, |
| 15 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] should we do an EAPI bump now with features that are already implemented? | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |