Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:58:29
Message-Id: 22627.35950.241094.574059@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process by Agostino Sarubbo
1 >>>>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
2
3 > with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and
4 > the support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some
5 > changes on our bugzilla have been done.
6
7 Thank you for the great work.
8
9 > [...]
10
11 > When you will choose one of those, you will see two new fields:
12 > - Atoms to stabilize
13
14 Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we are
15 trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't define
16 the term [2].
17
18 Ulrich
19
20 [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20151213-summary.txt
21 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/174322

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>