| 1 |
On Sun, 31 May 2015 09:46:30 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 31 May 2015 12:59, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I don't understand why one should add append-lfs-flags to almost |
| 6 |
> > every single package out there. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> no one is suggesting that route. append-lfs-flags is a kludge |
| 9 |
> (albeit an effective one) in the face of no upstream support. if you |
| 10 |
> look at the referenced tracker it includes pointers for fixing |
| 11 |
> packages in ways that can be sent upstream. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
well, other suggestions are similar, except of course that appending |
| 14 |
the flags is done upstream in some way or another |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
however, reading more in details the links you provided, what happened |
| 17 |
to your patch setting _FILE_OFFSET_BITS default to 64 ? |
| 18 |
( https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-03/msg00290.html ) |
| 19 |
which seems to be a much better solution to what i initially proposed. |
Archives