Archives
Archives
| From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:01:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20161014210053.GA9517@whubbs1.gaikai.biz | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:05:43PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | *snip* |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > If a package is src_install only, no |
| 6 | > src_compile, it should be required to have a -bin suffix, or -gbin if self made. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I disagree with this. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Remember that src_compile could be in an eclass or the package could be |
| 11 | using the default src_compile for the EAPI. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Also there may be no need to compile anything; the package may just be |
| 14 | scripts, data files or documentation of some kind. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Thanks, |
| 18 | |
| 19 | William |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |